So ends the month of Ceausescu. For our final thought on this deceased Eastern European dictator, let us not forget the beginning years, seemingly full of promise.
When Ceausescu came into power in 1965, he carried with him the hope of the Romanian people. He was initially idealistic, and an independent thinker. Though resolutely communist, he refused to simply follow the lead of the Soviet Union, and became known as a “maverick” (in your dreams, John McCain) amongst Soviet-sanctioned leaders. He condemned the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia, and pursued a policy of openness towards countries both East and West. He was the first of the Eastern Bloc to recognize West Germany as a country, and at home he seemed to welcome a free and open Romanian press. He was well thought of in the West, and Nixon chose him to be the first of the Warsaw Pact leaders to visit because of this rogue status. Sure, he made abortion illegal and marriage nearly impossible to get out of in 1966, and this perception of him being a Western-friendly maverick made access to the loans from the US and Western Europe that ended up bankrupting Romania all to easy to overdraw from, but he was doing relatively ok in other respects. Though there had been some whackness brewing, it was his inspiring 1971 trip to North Korea and China that showed him the way to becoming a true Whack Dictator. Mao Zedong and Kim Il-Sung became his idols, and it was after this that Ceausescu embraced megalomania as the quality of a true leader, distributing pamphlets authored by Kim Il-sung, and quoting Mao in his speeches.
And so, the moral of Ceausescu is to watch and wait as any new and promising leader takes the stage. Kiev, keep your eyes open and watchful in this moment of transition, and Tunisia, may your leader turn out to be as promising as he seems. May the future keep us from any further whackness at home.
Next month: Pinochet!